Legal Opinion

People v. Dairsaw

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1978PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order affirmed on the memorandum at the Appellate Division.

We would only add that unwarranted delay in arraignment is but one of the many pertinent factors bearing on the question of the voluntariness and, therefore, admissibility of a defendant’s inculpatory statements. (People v Vargas, 7 NY2d 555, 565-566; United States v Poole, 495 F2d 115, 120, cert den 422 US 1048.) Where, as in the case before us, there has been a voluntary and intelligent waiver by the defendant of his rights to counsel and to remain silent after he had been repeatedly advised of his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Poole v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. The People v. Jin Cheng LinNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. People v. CrosbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. People v. DylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API