– State v. Claerhout –
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 115,227 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JEREMY CLAERHOUT, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Evidence of a prior diversion agreement for driving while intoxicated may be relevant to establishing that a defendant was on notice that driving while intoxicated is dangerous. 2. The admissibility of evidence under K.S.A. 60-455 is subject to harmless error analysis on appeal. 3. It is not necessary that an expert witness demonstrate expertise in every theory, principle, or scientific discipline underlying the knowledge, skill, experience, training, or…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- United States v. TanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. David Earl FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Donovan NewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BrazzleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- State v. SatchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. BobianSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.