Legal Opinion
United States v. Tan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 2, 2001No. 00-2300PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
The United States brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731 challenging the district court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order (“Order”) granting Defendant Raymond Tan’s Motion in Li-mine Regarding Other Cases and Charges (“Motion in Limine”) which sought the exclusion of evidence of Defendant’s prior drunk driving convictions. The government contends that the district court erred as a matter of law in finding that Tan’s prior drunk driving record was not offered for a proper purpose under Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) and concluding, as a result, that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Crowder, Rochelle A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States v. David Earl FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. James Howard Van Metre, United States of America v. James Howard Van MetreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- United States v. SmallsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Tanberg v. SholtisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Donovan NewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.