Legal Opinion

People v. Gnozzo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1972PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.

These two cases test the use of telephone conversations intercepted under an eavesdropping warrant to establish probable cause for a subsequent search warrant against the outside party to the conversation, not named in the eavesdropping warrant. Appellant Zorn and respondent Gnozzo contend that the conversations may not be used against persons not named in the eavesdropping warrant, and especially so where the warrant was never amended to include them. Belated issues raised in the Zorn appeal are whether the eavesdropping warrant was supported by probable cause and whether its 30-day term and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. Eddie David CoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. SklaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
  5. United States v. KingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas Fury and John QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. People v. Di StefanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. Isadore MarionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. People v. BasilicatoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. United States v. Ralph PrincipieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API