Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 29, 1986No. 86-AB-561; CA A40124PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Claimant seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board (EAB) order which denied her unemployment benefits on the ground that she was unavailable for work. We reverse and remand.

Claimant worked as a printer. On January 1, 1986, she was temporarily laid off from her job at the Eugene Register-Guard. She enrolled part-time at the University of Oregon. Question 10 of the division’s Student Eligibility Questionnaire asked claimant what she would “do about school if [she] were offered work that conflicted with [her] school hours.” Claimant answered:

“If it were a full-time job, I would accept the job…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Petro v. EMP. DIV., DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Steinkellner v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Rulien v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API