Legal Opinion

Wolkenstein v. Reville

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 18, 1982No. 51, Docket 82-7173PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:

This is the latest in a long series of challenges in the state and federal courts over the last decade to the constitutionality of § 210 of New York’s Civil Service Law (the Taylor Law), which prohibits strikes by public employees. See Cheeseman v. Carey, 623 F.2d 1387, 1389-90 & note 3 (2 Cir.1980). The action, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and its jurisdictional counterpart, 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), in the District Court for the Western District of New York, contests the procedures prescribed by § 210.2 for determining whether a public employee participated in a strike…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Henríquez Soto v. Consejo de Educación SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  2. Allen v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Petrowski v. Norwich Free AcademySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Secretary, Agency of Natural Resources v. Upper Valley Regional Landfill Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Sifagaloa v. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement SystemHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API