Legal Opinion
Bergquist v. Medtronic, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 3, 1986No. C6-84-1243PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
On April 19,1983, respondent Edward W. Bergquist, as trustee for the heirs of Erik Henry Boteus, filed a complaint in Henne-pin County District Court against appellants Medtronic, Inc., and Medtronic Blood Systems, Inc. Defendants filed an answer on June 2, 1983, denying all of plaintiff’s allegations and affirmatively alleging that venue was improper. On February 22, 1984, defendants moved for dismissal on the grounds of forum non conveniens. The district court denied the motion on March 12, 1984, but on defendants’ motion for reconsideration, the court granted the motion and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Williams v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cleonilde Nunes De Melo v. Lederle Laboratories, a Division of American Cyanamid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Danielson v. National Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Carlenstolpe v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Hoppe v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Kennecott Holdings Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.