Legal Opinion

Roulo v. Board of Auditors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Mandamus. Belator applies for a mandamus for the allowance of his statutory fees for reporting mortgages to the assessing officers of Wayne county.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The Legislature of 1887 passed an act (No. 262) providing for the reporting of mortgages to the supervisors and assessing officers of the various counties of this State,, and to the registers of deeds of other counties wherein the mortgagee resided. This duty, under the act, devolved upon the registers of deeds. For making the list, and notifying the proper officers, the register was authorized to receive the following fees:

“The register of deeds shall receive ten cents for every such notice, to be audited and paid in the general manner out of the contingent fund of the county where the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McBride v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. White v. SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moore v. NationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Groesbeck v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Lewis v. RouloMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Board of Auditors v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Warner v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API