Legal Opinion

Warner v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Mandamus by Fred M. Warner, Daniel McCoy, and Edwin A. Wildey to compel Perry F. Powers, auditor general, to issue warrants for the payment of salaries to relators as members of the board of State auditors.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an application for a mandamus to ■compel the respondent to issue warrants in favor of relators as members of the board of State auditors. The question involved is the constitutionality of Act No. 171 of the Public Acts of 1901. In considering the very important question involved, we have been greatly aided by briefs of exceptional ability by counsel on both sides of the case.

The act under consideration reads as follows:

“The several State officers constituting the board of State auditors shall be paid for the year nineteen hundred ■one, and annually thereafter, the sum of eighteen…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Twitchell v. BlodgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Sears v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Converse v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  4. Love v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Ten Eyck v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Groesbeck v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API