Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Roulo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendant was register of deeds for the county of Wayne, and Emanuel Fox was a clerk under him. Eox was paid by the county of Wayne a salary of $1,000 per year. His working hours were from 8:30 A. M. to 4 p. m. Act No. 262, Laws of 1887, made it the duty of the register of deeds of each county to notify the supervisors and assessing officers of the various counties of the existence of mortgages recorded but undischarged. For every such notice the register was to receive 10 cents. In accordance with this act, defendant caused notices to be given of the mortgages in the county of Wayne.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howard v. PatrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Roulo v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Lafreniere's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Stevens v. BeardsleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API