Legal Opinion

Vertopoulos v. Siskiyou Silicates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2001No. 9710-07751; A106573PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Plaintiffs sold land to defendants, who intended to operate a mine on it. Defendants began mining the land but also began harvesting timber. Plaintiffs brought this action against defendants, alleging that they had cut the timber in violation of two land sale agreements. Defendants moved for summary judgment because the written land sale agreements did not prohibit them from cutting timber. The trial court granted defendants’ motion and awarded them some but not all of the attorney fees they sought. Plaintiffs have appealed, and defendants have cross-appealed. We affirm on both the appeal and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Seattle-First National Bank v. ScheiberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. R & C. RANCH, LLC v. KundeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Bennett v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Target Corp. v. Prestige Maintenance USA, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Village at North Pointe Condominiums Ass'n v. Bloedel Construction Co.Lincoln County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. North Marion School District 15 v. Acstar InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Johnson v. J. G. Wentworth Originations, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. West Hills Development Co. v. IncCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API