East Coast Collision & Restoration, Inc. v. Allyn
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on November 3, 1999, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear in order to show cause why the issues raised on appeal should not be summarily decided. Robert Allyn (Al-lyn) and Chester Vanderpyl, III (Vander-pyl) (collectively, owners), have appealed the trial justice’s denial of their motions for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial. After hearing the arguments of counsel for the parties and after examining the memoranda submitted, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown. Therefore the issues…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Focus Investment Associates, Inc. v. American Title Insurance Company, Focus Investment Associates, Inc. v. American Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Walsh v. Israel Couture Post, No. 2274 V.F.W. of United StatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
- Dyson v. City of PawtucketSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Morrocco v. PiccardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Ballet Fabrics, Inc. v. Four Dee Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HallenbeckSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Lucier v. Impact Recreation, Ltd.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Holley v. Argonaut Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- State v. IbrahimSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Konar v. PFL Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.