Legal Opinion

Standard-Vacuum Oil Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 1, 1948No. 48319PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, Judge

This is a motion to dismiss three of fifteen causes of action stated in plaintiff’s petition on the ground that they are barred by the statute of limitations.

The defendant has requested the Court to dismiss (a) the fifth claim stated in the amended petition, (b) that part of the seventh claim stated in paragraphs 64 to 67 of the amended petition, and (c) the fifteenth claim stated in the amended petition, or in the alternative, so much of the fifteenth claim as relates to the alleged requisition by defendant of petroleum supplies, and as ground therefor invokes the six-year period limitation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanger v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Braun v. SauerweinSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Hopkirk v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1806

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Marcos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  3. Standard-Vacuum Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Oerlikon MacHine Tool Works Buehrle & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  5. Marcos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API