Legal Opinion
Oerlikon MacHine Tool Works Buehrle & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 5, 1952No. 50229PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
This case is before us on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s petition because, it says, the judgment of this court entered on March 6, 1951, is res judicata and bars the present action, and also because the action is barred by the statute of limitations.
The decision rendered on March 6, 1951, was in case No. 49696, styled Oerlikon Machine Tool Works Buehrle & Co. v. United States, reported in 118 Ct.'Cl. 614. In that case plaintiff sued the United States because, it alleged, the United States had purchased from manufacturers in the United States Oerlikon antiaircraft…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hanger v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Osbourne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Heyman Cohen & Sons, Inc. v. M. Lurie Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Braun v. SauerweinSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roldan v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Joseph F. Rinehart v. Gloria D. Locke, Administrator of the Estate of Arnold R. Locke, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Wagner v. New York, Ontario and Western RailwayDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Ball v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.