Legal Opinion

Mings v. City of Fort Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 13, 1986No. 85-159PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The appellant, Dr. Harold Mings, objects to the use as a parking lot of part of a tract of land owned by the appellee St. Edward Mercy Medical Center. The tract is across the street from Dr. Mings’ home and directly adjacent to a vacant lot he owns. Dr. Mings has been denied declaratory and injunctive relief against the hospital as well as injunctive relief he sought against the appellee City of Fort Smith. The claim against the hospital is that the hospital agreed not to use the land for a parking lot and thus is estopped from doing so. The claim against the city is…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Taggart & Taggart Seed Company, Inc. v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Adams v. SimsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Potocki v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Taylor v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Fordyce v. VaughnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. SUMMIT MALL CO. LLC v. LemondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Bolen v. Washington County Zoning Board of AdjustmentsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Camden Community Development Corp. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Camden Community Development Corp. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API