Legal Opinion

August Schmidt Co. v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1965No. Case No. 97; Case No. 98; Case No. 99PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

At the outset we are met with the defendants’ objection that the plaintiffs have not perfected their appeal. The appeal is from what is designated an “Order on Motions after Verdict as to Liability” which in the plaintiffs’ brief is characterized as an interlocutory judgment. The order grants the defendants’ motion for a judgment dismissing the complaints and is not an appealable order under sec. 274.33, Stats. Lentz v. Northwestern National Casualty Co. (1963), 19 Wis. (2d) 569, 120 N. W. (2d) 722. The order is not a judgment, intermediate or final. However, after the notice of appeal was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Keplin v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Ferry v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Presser v. Siesel Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Brick and Block Corp. v. VogelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Gallagher v. ScherneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Walford v. BartschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. Van DuyseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API