Legal Opinion

Mid-Cal National Bank, a National Banking Association, and v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Bank of Stockton, And

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1979No. 76-3116PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURRENTINE, District Judge:

Bank of Stockton (hereinafter “Stockton”) appeals from a summary judgment entered against it. This case presents the question whether one bank owes a legal duty to another bank to discover a check kiting scheme that results in a loss to the second bank. The court below apparently determined that no such duty was owed by appellee Mid-Cal National Bank (hereinafter “Mid-Cal”) to Stockton. We affirm.

The essential facts are as follows. Mid-Cal and Stockton were used by certain individuals in their perpetration of a check kiting scheme. In a kite, accounts are maintained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Citizens Nat. Bank v. First Nat. BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. El Camino Resources, Ltd. v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. Chicago Title Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. FIRST NAT. BANK IN HARVEY v. Colonial BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Windsor Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
  5. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. First National Bank Of Little RockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API