Legal Opinion
La Malfa v. Piombo Bros.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 1945No. Civ. 12872PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendants entered upon a directed verdict. Defendant, Piombo Bros., is a copartnership engaged in the contracting business and at the time of the occurrence out of which this action arises had a contract to enlarge the San Francisco Airport in San Mateo County. This work required the hauling of material to make a fill and, in addition to using several of their own trucks to haul this material, Piombo Bros, engaged the services of trucks owned by other persons. It is undisputed that in the case of the trucks owned by others than Piombo…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Atlanta & Florida Railroad v. KimberlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- McDonald v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Thill v. Modern Erecting CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Hard v. Hollywood Turf ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Inglewood Teachers Ass'n. v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.