Legal Opinion

Barkley v. City of Bristol

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided December 30, 1961No. File 124157PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzGerald, J.

Plaintiffs’ complaint as amended is in two counts. The first count is in negligence and is directed against the defendant Marcotte while acting as a park policeman in the employ of the city of Bristol. The second count is directed against the defendant city of Bristol and expressly invokes § 7-465 of the statutes as the basis of liability of the municipal defendant. A demurrer has been interposed to both counts on the ground that they do not allege that the injured minor plaintiff was in the exercise of due care. The question presented is whether the two counts of the complaint as amended are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martyn v. DonlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Gondor v. PastorConnecticut Superior Court · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. Town of MilfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
  2. Derfall v. Town of West HartfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1964
  3. Bailey v. Town of StratfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
  4. Thomas v. CommerfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
  5. Statton v. CarozzaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API