Statton v. Carozza
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Chief Judge.
Defendant City of Waterbury having moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6), Fed. R.Civ.P., to dismiss the action against said defendant on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim against said defendant upon which relief can be granted; and
The Court having heard argument of counsel, having received and considered the motion and supplemental motion, briefs, affidavits, exhibits, pleadings and all papers on file; and
The Court being of the opinion that said motion and supplemental motion to dismiss should be denied for the reasons that
(A) With respect to defendant’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincoln Mine Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Martyn v. DonlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- MacLeod v. Town of MilfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.