Legal Opinion

Statton v. Carozza

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 21, 1967No. Civ. No. 12013Published

1Opinion of the Court

TIMBERS, Chief Judge.

Defendant City of Waterbury having moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6), Fed. R.Civ.P., to dismiss the action against said defendant on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim against said defendant upon which relief can be granted; and

The Court having heard argument of counsel, having received and considered the motion and supplemental motion, briefs, affidavits, exhibits, pleadings and all papers on file; and

The Court being of the opinion that said motion and supplemental motion to dismiss should be denied for the reasons that

(A) With respect to defendant’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincoln Mine Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Martyn v. DonlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  5. MacLeod v. Town of MilfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API