Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Commerford

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 1, 1970No. File 115043PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKlau, J.

The present action as amended is brought in two counts. The first count seeks recovery against the defendant Commerford, an employee of the defendant Town of Branford, for injuries sustained as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendant Commerford in the operation of a motor vehicle owned by the defendant town. The second count seeks recovery against the defendant town pursuant to the provisions of § 7-465 of the General Statutes. The defendants have demurred to both counts for the reason that the plaintiff has failed to allege that he was in the exercise of due care at the time of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martyn v. DonlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Porpora v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. MacLeod v. Town of MilfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
  4. Wakelee v. DeSantoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  5. Barkley v. City of BristolConnecticut Superior Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ahern v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API