Legal Opinion

City of San Pablo v. East Bay Municipal Utility District

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1977No. Civ. 40714PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EMERSON, J. *

Defendant-appellant East Bay Municipal Utility District (hereafter EBMUD) appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff-respondent City of San Pablo (hereafter the city) the. sum of $53,446 which the city had previously paid to EBMUD for the purpose of relocating certain water facilities in the “South Entrance Redevelopment Project” area of the city.

As will be shown more fully below, the city advanced the sum in question in order to facilitate the relocation of certain water lines. EBMUD had refused to move the lines at its own expense. The parties entered into an agreement,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Alameda County Employees' Ass'n v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Boise Redevelopment AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Richmond Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1986
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API