Legal Opinion

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Redevelopment Agency

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1978No. Civ. 52698PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

Appellant Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company appeals from a judgment of dismissal upon the sustaining of respondents’ demurrer to a petition for writ of mandate. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 581, subd. 3; 58Id.) Appellant seeks to compel respondent Redevelopment Agency of the City of Glendale to pay relocation assistance benefits (Gov. Code, § 7260 et seq.) for appellant’s costs in relocating its telephone cables from a public street which was vacated to make way for a redevelopment project. We hold the trial court correctly determined that as a matter of law appellant is not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. City of Mountain View v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. City of San Pablo v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Damé Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Boise Redevelopment AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. City of Livermore v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API