Legal Opinion

Lewis v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 20, 1925No. 2362PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Goods imported at the port of New York which were capable of being marked, stamped, branded, or labeled without injury were *23not marked, stamped, branded, or labeled as required by tbat part of section 304 (a) of the act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Sec. 304 (a). That every article imported into the United States which is capable of being marked, stamped, branded, or labeled without injury at the time of its manufacture or production, shall be marked, stamped, branded, or labeled in legible English words in a conspicuous place that shall not be covered or obscured by any subsequent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradford Co. v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. United States v. Shallus & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goldman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  2. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  3. Corrigan v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. H. L. Gwalter & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  5. H. L. Gwalter & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API