Corrigan v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division, dismissing the protest of appellant against the action of the collector concerning his disposal or repayment of additional duties ordered remitted by said division of said court under section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
The trial court considered two so-called “protests” and in its decision (Abstract 51046) held that the “formal protest” was untimely and dismissed the same. It said in part:
It will be seen from the foregoing [table of dates] that protest was not filed within the 60-day period after…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. FishSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Bradford Co. v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Fish v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Brown & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Kee Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Pan Pacific Textile Group, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2005