Legal Opinion

Goldman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 7, 1939No. C. D. 174PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States, arising at the port of New Orleans, in which the plaintiff protests against the assessment of duty on certain antiques. The rate of duty claimed to have been illegally assessed is not stated in the protest but the record shows that the merchandise was classified as furniture and assessed at *447the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and that an additional duty at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem was assessed under the provisions of section 489. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is free…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  2. Protests 110236-K of Hooker Electrochemical Co.United States Customs Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API