Legal Opinion
Kao v. Red Lion Municipal Authority
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 25, 1974No. Civ. 73-680PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHERIDAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, James Y. Kao and George Peng, landowners of a 254-acre tract in York County, Pennsylvania, brought this action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U. S.C.A. § 1983, seeking damages against the defendants on the ground their land has been appropriated without the payment of just compensation and has been damaged by the willful and continuous trespass of the defendants. Jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1343. The defendants are the Red Lion Municipal Authority (Red Lion), Carl E. Seitz, manager of Red Lion, Mount Joy Construction Co., Inc. (Mount Joy), and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Robert A. Wise v. Richard Anthony Bravo, the City of Pueblo, and Pueblo Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Pedro Amezquita v. Rafael Hernandez ColonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Rutherford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Collier v. City of SpringdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.