State v. Bunning
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
The defendant has brought forward seven assignments of error. We shall discuss two of them. The defendant first assigns error to the court’s substitution of an alternate juror for a juror who was excused after the jury had begun its sentencing deliberations. We believe this assignment of error has merit.
The jury began its deliberations shortly after lunch and continued until the evening recess. The next morning, one of the jurors asked to be excused because she said she was a manic-depressive and could not continue with the trial. The court removed this juror and replaced her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skipper v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. RouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. . DaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. MaskeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. PoindexterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- State v. TheerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.