Legal Opinion

Holt v. Saiya

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 22, 2000No. 83,071PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

William R, Holt appeals the trial court’s decision denying his request to reinstate his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Holt claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney allegedly dismissed the petition without Holt’s permission and that his attorney had not communicated effectively with him.

This case is ultimately determined by the interpretation of the 30-day rule in K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 60-1501(b) and whether this can be a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in the context of post-conviction habeas corpus proceedings.

On July 1, 1997, Holt filed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Wainwright v. TornaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. State v. SperrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. McCarty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  4. McMillan v. McKuneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. Brull v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API