Legal Opinion

Brull v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 9, 2003No. 89,812PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, C.J.:

Petitioner Mark D. Brull appeals the summary denial of his habeas corpus action, claiming the district court erred when finding his petition was untimely and in the alternative that petitioner’s substantive claims were without merit. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

A detailed discussion of the underlying facts is not required for us to resolve the issues presented.

Jurisdiction

First, we must determine if the district court erred when finding petitioner’s action was untimely filed.

“(b) Except as provided in K.S.A. 60-1507, and amendments thereto, an inmate in the custody of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. State v. BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CluckCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  2. Stotts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API