Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This regulatory takings case is before the court following a trial on liability and damages. Plaintiff maintains that regulations enacted by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), which placed restrictions on chicken farms suspected of selling salmonella-infested eggs, caused a taking of plaintiffs healthy eggs, hens, and hen houses at three of its farms. Plaintiff argues the restrictions had a severe economic impact on its operations, interfered with its investment-backed expectations, and were not in the public’s best interests. Plaintiff asserts a general…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Swisher v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007