Legal Opinion
Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 30, 2004No. 03-5103PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Rose Acre Farms, Inc. (“Rose Acre”) filed the present action in the United States Court of Federal Claims in 1992, claiming that United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) regulations that restricted egg sales from and imposed other requirements on farms that tested positive for the presence of salmonella bacteria effected a taking requiring compensation under the Fifth Amendment. The trial court held that Rose Acre was entitled to compensation for a taking of the eggs affected by the regulations, Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United States, 55 Fed.Cl. 643, 660 (2003),…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- A & D Auto Sales, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Resource Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.