Legal Opinion
Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. Maxwell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 16, 1973No. 69 Civ. 4790PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
I
Plaintiffs move, pursuant to Rule 28(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”), for an order issuing a letter rogatory to secure the testimony of a representative of Price Waterhouse & Co. in London, England having personal knowledge of an investigation of the Pergamon Press, Ltd. by Price Wa-terhouse, the latter’s report of the 1968 and 1969 Pergamon Press accounts, and having custody of the work papers of Price Waterhouse in connection with these matters. Plaintiffs also move, pursuant to Rule 37(a), FRCP, for an order directing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Herbst v. AbleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Willard J. Lamorte v. Hon. Walter R. Mansfield, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Herbert K. Zassenhaus and Charlotte S. Zassenhaus v. The Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v. Lambert Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1963
- UEBERSEE FINANZ-KORPORATION, ETC. v. BrownellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bankers Trust Company v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Villaneuva Compania Naviera, S.A. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- In Re Anschuetz & Co., GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. RosenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.