Legal Opinion

Herbst v. Able

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 18, 1972No. 66 Civ. 3216PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion on Motion to Produce

MOTLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek an order requiring certain named defendants and certain present and former employees of defendant Douglas Aircraft Company to procure for inspection and copying transcripts of testimony given by these persons at a private hearing conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in 1967. (Rules 34 and 37, Fed.R. Civ.P.)1

In these consolidated actions one of plaintiffs’ pivotal claims is that certain statements made by defendants in connection with the sale of Douglas debentures in 1966 relating to the 1966 net…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willard J. Lamorte v. Hon. Walter R. Mansfield, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. Hanson v. Gartland Steamship Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
  3. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A. v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
  4. In re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1972

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In re Folding Carton Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
  4. Raimey v. Wright National Flood InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  5. Flagg ex rel. Bond v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API