Legal Opinion

Rayl v. Thurman

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1930No. 28344PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Suit was filed in the chancery court by appellee to foreclose a deed of trust and to set aside certain conveyances as fraudulent. The deed of trust was given by appellant to secure a note for two thousand five hundred dollars, with interest, dated July 5, 1919, and due one year after date. The chancery court sustained the bill and entered a decree for appellee.

It is the first and principal contention of appellant that the record sufficiently shows that the entire debt has been paid and that the decree is therefore wholly erroneous. The manner in which appellant attempts to show this is by…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fleming v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Estate of StamperMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Horne v. State Building CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. E. L. Bruce. Co v. BroganMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Borne v. Estate of CarrawayMississippi Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API