Legal Opinion

E. L. Bruce. Co v. Brogan

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1936No. 32113PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellant operates a large sawmill for the manufacture of hardwood lumber. In this operation appellant uses many mules. Appellee was employed by appellant as a mill blacksmith and horseshoer; it being the duty of appellee to keep all the mules properly shod. In attempting toi shoe one of the mules, appellee was kicked by the animal and was severely and permanently injured.

There was sufficient testimony to support the following findings of fact by the jury: The offending animal was one of two mules which had been purchased and put upon the work about two months before the injury. Both these…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Bridges v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Rayl v. ThurmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hegwood v. J. J. Newman Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. DickinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Jackson v. AinsworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Boston v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. McGill v. City of LaurelMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Crosby v. BurgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Eagle Cotton Oil Co. v. SollieMississippi Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API