State v. Newell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred to his prejudice in quashing subpoenas duces tecum issued by defendant upon the Eliada Home for Children for the production of all of its files and records relating to the victim and another witness, both of whom were residents of the Home.
There is no common law right of discovery in criminal cases, State v. Alston, 307 N.C. 321, 298 S.E. 2d 631 (1983), and there is no statute that grants a defendant in a criminal trial access as of right to any documents unless they are “within the possession, custody, or control of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Vaughan v. BroadfootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. BartlettArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. LoveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. StimsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Nicholson v. ThomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.