Legal Opinion

Brenner v. Berkowitz

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 14, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

261 N.J. Super. 63 (1992)

617 A.2d 1225

JUDITH R. BRENNER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

HOWARD BERKOWITZ, RUTH BERKOWITZ AND ARBEE ASSOCIATES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 2, 1992.

Decided December 14, 1992.

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, SHEBELL and CONLEY.[1]

Martin J. Brenner argued the cause for appellant (Brenner & Brenner, attorneys).

Jonathan L. Goldstein and Richard K. Coplon argued the cause for respondents (Hellring, Lindeman, Goldstein & Siegal, attorneys; Mr. Goldstein, Mr. Coplon and Judah I. Elstein, of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Paper Mill Playhouse v. Millburn TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. CampSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Orchard v. CovelliDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Exadaktilos v. Cinnaminson Realty Co. Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brenner v. BerkowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Walensky v. Jonathan Royce Intern.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API