Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Nazario

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided October 19, 2001No. ACM 34221PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

YOUNG, Chief Judge:

Court members convicted the appellant of fraudulent enlistment, unlawful entry, and rape. Articles 83,134,120, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 883, 934, 920. The approved sentence consists of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 20 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E-l. We affirm.

I. Legal and Factual Sufficiency

The appellant alleges his convictions for rape and unlawful entry are legally and factually insufficient. Our statutory duties to review a case for legal and factual sufficiency are spelled out in Article 66(c), UCMJ, 10…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. Jackson v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. SillsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  2. United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  3. United States v. SillsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  4. United States v. RileyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  5. United States v. Sergeant OTIS R. DUCKSWORTHArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API