Legal Opinion

Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 13, 1972No. 50233Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is the third time the claim set forth in paragraph 13 of plaintiffs’ mul-ti-claim petition has come before us. In *1316Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. United States, 181 Ct.Cl. 739 (1967), we held that a proper claim had been stated on the pleadings. In Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. United States, 417 F.2d 1340, 189 Ct.Cl. 319 (1969), after a trial, we returned the case for a full new trial, and set forth in our opinion what plaintiffs would have to show in order to recover. The second trial was had before Trial Commissioner Harry E. Wood who has filed a report…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Alabama Power Company v. Federal Power Commission, United States, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API