Legal Opinion

The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 14, 1969No. 50233PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. United States, 181 Ct.Cl. 739 (1967), the court held that plaintiffs stated a valid claim in paragraph 13 of their petition. This cause of action was that under the provisions of the license issued by the Federal Power Commission to the Montana Power Company — which license included the company’s use of a site on the Tribes’ land in the Flathead Reservation, in connection with the licensee’s power project on and along the Flathead River and Flathead Lake — the defendant required the company to sell power to a federally-sponsored irrigation…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. United States v. Fort Sill Apache Tribe of OklahomaUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API