Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
This motion presents another claim in this many-faceted litigation,1 a claim resulting from the use under a federal *742license of tbe Tribes’ land in Flathead Eeservation, Montana, for power-production facilities. The Indians receive annual payments from the licensee, but seek greater compensation. They assert that, at the behest of the Federal Government, the licensee must sell power to a federally sponsored irrigation project at so low a rate as to subsidize that agency and deprive the plaintiffs of the full power value of tbeir land used by the licensee. The defendant moves for summary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Shoshone Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Confederated Tribes of Colville Reservation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.