The Turret Crown
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, Circuit Judge.
Four libels were filed against the steamer Turret Crown to recover for damage to cargo shipped in good and delivered in bad order, and in one of the cases also for short delivery. The cases were tried together. The answer of the claimant set up the following clauses in the bill of lading, relying especially upon the provisions in italics:
“It is mutually agreed * * * that the carrier shall not be liable for loss or damage occasioned by * * * any latent defects in hull, machinery or appurtenances, misfeasance, error in judgment, any act, neglect or default whatsoever of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- The Carib PrinceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The Malcolm Baxter, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
- Vulcanite Roofing Co. v. Commonwealth S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
- Graysonia, Nashville & Ashdown Railroad v. Newberger Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Hartford & New York Transp. Co. v. Rogers & Hubbard Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.