Legal Opinion
Hartford & New York Transp. Co. v. Rogers & Hubbard Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 5, 1931No. Nos. 111, 112PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND,
Circuit Judge.
The Hartford & New York Transportation Company filed a libel against Rogers & Hubbard Company to recover general average charges, and the latter filed a cross-libel against the Hartford & New York Transportation Company for cargo damage. A decree was granted for general average ' charges in the first cause, and the libel was dismissed in the second cause.
The libelant Hartford-& New York Transportation Company, operates tugs and barges carrying cargo from New York through Long Island Sound to points on the Connecticut river. Rogers & Hubbard, who were their…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- M'lanahan v. the Universal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ConartySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- The Malcolm Baxter, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Charles Pfizer & Co. v. Convoy S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- Chicago Great Western Railroad v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Yates v. DannDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1951
- W. E. Valliant & Co. v. Rayonier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- The Jl LuckenbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- The YungayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Compañia General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.