Legal Opinion

Brady v. Yodanza

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 1979No. 929; No. 930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This case presents the sole question of whether appellees have the use of a thirty-foot easement over separate pieces of land owned by appellants. The Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas concluded that such a right existed, and consequently denied appellants’ prayer for injunctive relief. We disagree and reverse that order.

The salient facts of the case are not in dispute. It is, rather, their interpretation vis-a-vis the intent of the parties and settled principles of property law that is the source of contention. Succinctly, the facts are as follows. Appellants Robert H.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Piper v. MowrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Lauderbach-Zerby Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Becker v. RittenhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Kanefsky v. Dratch Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Rusciolelli v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brady v. YodanzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API