Legal Opinion

Ruckman v. PHH Mortgage Corporation

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 1, 2022No. 5:21-cv-00923Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ANGELA L. RUCKMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 5:21-cv-00923 ) v. ) ) PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION ) JUDGE BRIDGET M. BRENNAN d/b/a PHH MORTGAGE SERVICING, ) ) and ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER CLUNK, HOOSE CO., L.P.A., ) ) Defendants. ) Plaintiff Angela L. Ruckman (“Ruckman”) filed this action against the servicer of her residential mortgage loan, PHH Mortgage Corporation d/b/a PHH Mortgage Servicing (“PHH”), under

12 C.F.R. § 1024.1

et seq. (known as “Regulation X”), which implements the federal Real Estate Settlement…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API