Legal Opinion

Bundren v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1983No. Civ. 68237PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE, P. J.

Elaine M. Bundren (hereafter referred to as Petitioner) seeks a writ of mandate to compel the trial court to vacate its order granting partial summary judgment on her cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress against Los Robles Regional Medical Center (hereafter referred to as Los Robles).

A trial court is justified in granting summary judgment only if “the declarations filed in support of it, strictly construed, contain facts sufficient to entitle the hospital to judgment, and those of the plaintiff, liberally construed, show that there was no issue…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Cervantez v. J. C. Penney Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kentucky Fried Chicken National Management Co. v. WeathersbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Kruse v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Yun Hee So v. Sook Ja ShinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Flores v. EMC Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  5. Ross v. Creel Printing & Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API