Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ross v. Creel Printing & Publishing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 2002No. A095949PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEMELLO, J.

Plaintiff Daniel C. Ross appeals from a judgment of dismissal following a trial court order sustaining the demurrer of defendant Creel Printing & Publishing Company, Inc., without leave to amend. We affirm the judgment.

Facts and Procedural History

Plaintiff Daniel C. Ross (Ross) filed a verified complaint in the San Francisco Superior Court on March 2, 2001 against defendants Creel Prints ing & Publishing Company, Inc. (Creel), Gary R. Kasufkin, and Does 1 to 10. Plaintiff alleged on information and belief a single cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Flores v. EMC Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  2. Costa v. National Action Financial ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2007
  3. BFGC Architects Planners, Inc. v. Forcum/Mackey Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Bfgc Architects Planners v. forcum/mackeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API