Legal Opinion

Kime v. Koch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1949No. Nos. 34,736, 34,737, 34,738, 34,739, 34,740PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

Defendant Carl Koch appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. Originally, separate actions were commenced by each of the five plaintiffs against Carl Koch and Frank McGreary. The cases were consolidated for trial, and the appeals likewise have been consolidated here. Yerdicts were rendered by the jury in favor of each of the plaintiffs against both defendants. Only defendant Koch has appealed.

Many of the facts involved are not in dispute. Plaintiffs’ injuries arose out of a collision which occurred about…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Hoehne v. MittelstadtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hinman v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Cosgrove v. McGonagleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Seidl v. Trollhaugen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Norton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Coble v. LaceySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Schiro v. RaymondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API