Cosgrove v. McGonagle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Defendant appeals from an order denying his blended motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. For decision here is the question of whether the evidence sustains the verdict. Determination thereof requires a rather exhaustive résumé of the facts appearing in the record.
Plaintiff, 45 years of age, well educated, and a teacher of many years’ experience in her chosen field, was engaged in that capacity in one of the public schools of Duluth. Her school -work was to begin September 5, 1933, the day following the unfortunate accident to which we shall…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sommerfield v. FluryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Johnson v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Faber v. HerdliskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- E. C. Vogt, Inc. v. Ganley Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cofran v. SwanmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Northern Liquid Gas Co. v. Hildreth (Two Cases.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Swanson v. LaFontaineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Dehen v. BerningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Swanson v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.