Legal Opinion

Cosgrove v. McGonagle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1935No. 30,449PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his blended motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. For decision here is the question of whether the evidence sustains the verdict. Determination thereof requires a rather exhaustive résumé of the facts appearing in the record.

Plaintiff, 45 years of age, well educated, and a teacher of many years’ experience in her chosen field, was engaged in that capacity in one of the public schools of Duluth. Her school -work was to begin September 5, 1933, the day following the unfortunate accident to which we shall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sommerfield v. FluryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Johnson v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Faber v. HerdliskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. E. C. Vogt, Inc. v. Ganley Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cofran v. SwanmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Northern Liquid Gas Co. v. Hildreth (Two Cases.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. Swanson v. LaFontaineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Dehen v. BerningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Swanson v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API